本文重新審視預存與持存之關係在胡塞爾、德希達，乃至斯蒂格勒等人的思想著述中的闡釋，其中胡塞爾後期所著之〈貝爾瑙手稿〉對此議題提出新的觀點，因此以額外篇幅深入探討。本次發表亟欲藉由這道歷史軌跡，將筆者於《論數位物的存在》一書中所發展的第三預存概念加以申論，而此一概念將有助理解從債到期待這個範圍之內的預期技術，亦演示了不能被化約成任何持存的第三預存，會變成數位自動化現處階段的核心問題，形成新的政治體制。我們必須有系統地檢驗第三預存的議題並使之完善，以便處理對全新心智生態學的思索。
第三預存、數位物、現象學、檔案、第三持存
This paper revisits the relation between protention and retension in the work of Husserl, Derrida to Stiegler, with special attention to Husserl's later Bernau manuscripts, which shed new light on this question. Through this historical trajectory, this talk hopes to elaborate on what I developed in On the Existence of Digital Objects the concept of tertiary protention, by which we can understand as technologies of anticipation ranging from debt to prediction. It suggests that tertiary protention, which cannot be reduced to any form of retention, becomes the central question of the current stage of digital automation and constitutes a new regime of politics. In order to inquire into the new ecologies of mind, we will have to systematically examine and integrate the question of tertiary protention.
tertiary protention, digital objects, phenomenology, archives, tertiary rention
