「傳統」，一個非西方建築發展脈絡中的永恆課題，如何詮釋傳統也是非西方建築有別於西方現代建築的一大特色。在現代建築發展脈絡中，建築師如何解釋傳統，被視為非西方建築師面對現代建築發展浪潮襲來時的一種覺醒與自我的建立，也是創造「建築」的基石。因此，本研究聚焦兩位對於台灣與日本戰後建築發展帶來重大影響的建築師，王大閎與丹下健三，期待透過作品與論述的考察，探討兩人於建築製作中的傳統論。本論雖為比較研究，但主要的著眼點並非是認識二者主張的不同；反之，本論期待探索兩者分屬不同發展脈絡中的建築師，面對同為東亞文化下所建構的傳統想像時，其建築主張的內涵與交集。本論的目的除了企圖系統性的認識兩位建築師在現代建築語境中回應傳統的主張外，更期待將過去被視為各自獨立的東亞諸國的建築發展，跨越地域的限制，透過二者傳統論內涵的交集建構對話平台，以一種更全面的視角來理解東亞戰後建築的發展。
東亞建築師、傳統論、建築構成、王大閎、丹下健三
"Tradition" is an eternal subject of non-Western architectural development, and it is also a major feature that is different from the development of Western modern architecture. In the context of the development of modern architecture, how architects interpret "tradition" is regarded as the awakening and self-establishment of non-Western architects who face the wave of modern architectural development, and it is also the cornerstone of the creation of architecture. Therefore, this research focuses on two architects who have had a significant impact on the development of architecture in Taiwan and Japan, Wang Da-Hong and Tange Kenzo, to discuss their theory of architectural theories by researching their works and discourses. Although this research is a comparative study, the main focus is not to understand the differences between Wang and Tange; on the contrary, this research looks forward to explore the similarities between the two architects who are in different development contexts but facing the traditional imagination constructed under the same East Asian culture. The purpose of this research is not only to systematically understand the two architects' response to architectural tradition in the context of modern architecture, but also to look forward to construct a dialogue platform which can transcend geographical constraints, to understand the development of postwar architecture in East Asia from a more comprehensive perspective.
East Asian architect, Wang Da-Hong, Tange Kenzo
